Four uploads a month.Six months, no missed date.
A SaaS team was publishing when the founder found a free evening. We took the schedule off him and turned it into an operation.
Client named on request. Figures below are indicative pending final sign-off.
Publish weekly without the founder editing at midnight.
The channel was the top of their funnel and everyone knew it. It was also the first thing dropped whenever a release slipped, because the only person who could finish an edit was the person running the company.
They did not need a better editor. They needed the publishing date to stop depending on anyone’s spare evening.
Footage arrived in three formats from three places.
Three things, then repetition.
A standing intake folder
One destination, one naming rule, one place to look. Recording day stopped generating a scavenger hunt, and the edit could start the same afternoon.
A locked edit template
Titles, lower thirds, pacing and the outro were decided once. Every episode inherits them, so nothing is redesigned weekly and nothing drifts.
A two-reviewer QA pass
An internal check against a fixed list before anything reaches the client. The founder now sees a near-final cut, not a first draft — which is why one review round became enough.
Six months in.
We stopped negotiating deadlines internally. The week’s edits land before we ask for them.
One rail became four.
Month four added vertical cut-downs from the same recordings. Month seven added the thumbnail system, because the covers had become the weakest link in a process that was otherwise predictable.
Same problem,different channel?
Tell us what you publish and how often it slips. We'll come back with the slate we'd run and what it takes to hold it.